Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satyabrat Sinha

:{{la|Satyabrat Sinha}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Satyabrat_Sinha Stats])

:({{Find sources|Satyabrat Sinha}})

Does not meet WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Randykitty (talk) 19:28, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

• Delete Judging by GS cites-too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:02, 8 March 2013 (UTC).
• Delete. There is no evidence of passing WP:PROF, and (likely for the same reasons) the article is filled with the sort of minor accomplishments that belong more in a cv than in an encyclopedia article. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
• Delete No signs of passing WP:PROF or WP:BIO. I can't help but get the feeling that a certain subset of the population thinks Wikipedia is a CV database, like monster.com or something. Ray^Talk 01:26, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

::The trouble is that Wikipedia invites everybody in the world to write a BLP about themselves. It is not surprising that many misguided people accept. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:38, 10 March 2013 (UTC).

• Delete-Not a notable person. Recommend for quick delete.Jussychoulex (talk) 10:32, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.