Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarab Studio
=[[Scarab Studio]]=
:{{la|Scarab Studio}} ([{{fullurl:Scarab Studio|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarab Studio}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Non-notable corp. References given do not support notability. Fails WP:CORP. Drawn Some (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
::Speedy delete After reviewing the "references", I doubt any of them meet WP standards. One is a site hosted/maintained by a single person on a .edu domain, one is a description of work created by the company (in the company's own words), and the other, while possibly about a piece of work the company created, does not even mention the company... Wikiwikikid (talk) 20:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Not speedy, as it doesn't meet any of the criteria. However, it does appear to be non-notable, with no significant independent coverage that I could find. Note that there was an identically titled studio in London in the first half of the 20th century, however it appears to be unrelated to this one. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC).
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 16:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.