Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SciChart

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 03:57, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:SciChart]]=

:{{la|1=SciChart}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=SciChart}})

Entirely promotional and fails WP:NORG. Amigao (talk) 01:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Science, Medicine, Software, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:Delete - Fails WP:ORGSIG due to the lack of reliable independent sources. The only source covering the company is GlobeNewswire, and its [https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/01/16/3010563/0/en/From-Data-to-Movement-The-Breakthrough-Helping-Paralyzed-Patients-Walk-Again.html article] has numerous issues and reads like an advertorial. The content is filled with "peacock-like" language and cites the company itself as a source. — Staniulis^TALK 08:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:*Delete Not finding any significant coverage of the company or its product. Available material is largely promotional.

:Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 20:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete too much self sourced material which does not establish notability and fails to be independent. Iljhgtn (talk) 22:05, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.