Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science fiction disaster film
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per WP:G5. No prejudice to anyone wanting to recreate this, as long as it's sourced with RS to show how it merits an article separate from disaster film. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
=[[Science fiction disaster film]]=
:{{la|Science fiction disaster film}} – (
:({{Find sources|Science fiction disaster film}})
Duplicate of Disaster Film Gaijin42 (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
;Not a reason
Not a valid reason why to delete the page,it doesnt meet any of the Wikipedia:Deletion policy list of 14:Reasons why to nominate a page for speedy deletion,this article is for list of Science fiction disaster films not a copy of List of disaster films.Message to Administraters,maybe the article name is wrong,do change it to-List of Science fiction disaster films.
::Note, that this was not a speedy deletion, but just a regular deletion. Wikipedia:REDUNDANTFORK Gaijin42 (talk) 17:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Many disaster films are not science fiction (e.g., The Towering Inferno, The Posiden Adventure, Earthquake, Airport, Dante's Peak, etc.) Whether the more specific topic satisfies LISTN I'll leave here for the rest of the discussion.) --j⚛e deckertalk 23:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
As the creator has now been ifdef blocked as a sock, this article may qualify for speedy deletion as G5. Gaijin42 (talk) 00:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.