Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scorched tv

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete G12 Copyright infringement by {{admin|Athaenara}}. Non-admin closing. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:51, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Scorched tv]]=

:{{la|Scorched tv}} ([{{fullurl:Scorched tv|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scorched tv}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. Rather hard to identify what this article is about, though it seems to be about an Australian TV show. Little else can establish the show's notability. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete Article is non-notable and screams self-promotion. Beemer69 ^chitchat 02:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete per WP:SPAM Artene50 (talk) 04:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Probable copyvio. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Is in large parts a copyright violation of [http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=14652&s=Features] and borderline blatant advertising.
Delete, could be done speedily since there's no non-copyright infringing material worth keeping.
Will most probably become notable down the line [http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&safe=off&q=SCORCHED+%22Goalpost+Pictures%22+OR+telemovie&btnG=Search], no prejudice against recreation.
Amalthea^Talk 20:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.