Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Doe

{{Delrevafd|date=2009 July 30}}

{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse top|bg=#F3F9FF|1=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Doe|padding=1px}}|}}

=[[Scott Doe]]=

:{{la|Scott Doe}} ([{{fullurl:Scott Doe|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Doe}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Original reason for PROD removed. The footballer has never played in a fully-professional match. Fails WP:ATHLETE and the sources provided from the Dorset Echo are purely trivial. I barely consider the 3rd level of English football notable - this guy played in the 6th! Vintagekits (talk) 13:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete, as nominator.--Vintagekits (talk) 13:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep satisfied the Good Article criteria. Easily passes WP:N, with the non-trivial sources provided. Ridiculous nom. --Jimbo[online] 13:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:*Comment, yes, loads of sources - but they all say he played in the 6th tier of English football infront of crowds of 50! oh yeah - and he played with Theo Walcott as a kid - you dont become notable by association. The sources are merely local paper dross, reports local matches.--Vintagekits (talk) 13:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

::*You're scraping the barrell there claiming the reports are dross and crowd figures (which are clearly inaccurate). He is the main subject of at least two articles passing WP:GNG. --Jimbo[online] 13:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse bottom}}|}}