Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Etzler

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete -- Y not? 15:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Scott Etzler]]=

:{{la|Scott Etzler}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Scott_Etzler Stats])

:({{Find sources|Scott Etzler}})

To me this fails basic criteria for notability. Figured it should be opened up to discussion though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Basic_criteria Sulfurboy (talk) 13:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Further comment I left on talk page: The majority of the article relies on Etzler's linkdin profile. Outside of blog business websites and a couple of IU articles , I see no significant media coverage, and certainly none in any higher rung sources. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (message) @ 13:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (confer) @ 13:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (state the obvious) @ 13:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Weak keep: [http://www.sbnonline.com/2010/09/scott-etzler-evaluates-opportunities-to-grow-intercall-how-to-assess-potential-markets-for-new-ideas/] and [http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20081018/ISSUE03/100030808] are independent sources that might establish notability. Edge3 (talk) 09:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 20:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Keep - Found sources help push to GNG, but the article needs more work to be safe from deletion in the future. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.