Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScreenShot Direct

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

=[[ScreenShot Direct]]=

:{{la|ScreenShot Direct}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ScreenShot_Direct Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|ScreenShot Direct}})

Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was [https://www.google.com/search?q=ScreenShot+Direct+software+Shoreline&biw=1280&bih=701&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3AJanuary+2000%2Ccd_max%3AAugust+2015&tbm=nws#q=ScreenShot+Direct+software+Shoreline this] and there hasn't been any change since starting in June 2007. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up download site links, but no significant WP:RS coverage. Dialectric (talk) 18:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Pinging interested subject users {{U|NinjaRobotPirate}}, {{U|DMacks}}, {{U|Czar}}, {{U|Esquivalience}} and {{U|Salvidrim}}. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs) 06:14, 3 November 2015‎(UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete - Doesn't have significant coverage in reliable source, fails GNG and also doesn't pass the criteria in WP:NSOFT (essay).—UY Scuti ^Talk 19:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete - not enough significant coverage to show it passes notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.