Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scumis-Wade

:{{la|Scumis-Wade}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Scumis-Wade Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Scumis-Wade}})

Something obviously made up by the article author or someone they know. Qualifies under WP:CSD#A11, but since the CSD tag was removed by an IP editor whom I cannot confirm to be the same person as the article author, let's do this the hard way. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• Speedy delete A11. The disruptive actions of a "convenient" IP editor should not bind our hands; Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. And there's really no reason to keep this around for 7 days pro forma. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 16:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• Speedy delete A11 and G3. —teb728 t c 20:20, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy delete A7, web content that doesn't indicate notability. No need to fault the nominator for being cautious—better to look before you leap. Altamel (talk) 22:51, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. The article doesn't have a WP:SNOWBALL's chance of surviving this discussion, so there's no need to wait around a week to delete it. —Granger (talk · contribs) 23:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy D IP removed CSD twice, this needs an expedited deletion.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. I still don't see enough context to even know what this page is trying to say.—John Cline (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.