Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean E. Brotherson

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

=[[Sean E. Brotherson]]=

:{{la|Sean E. Brotherson}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Sean E. Brotherson}})

Assistant professor who happens to have written a book, Why Fathers Count: The Importance of Fathers and their Involvement with Children. Is this enough to pass WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR? Abductive (reasoning) 02:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 04:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 04:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Although [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=%22Sean+E.+Brotherson%22 GS] shows h-index of 6, WoS ("Author=(brotherson s*)") gives only a 1. Far short of impact described by WP:PROF. This is an uncontroversial delete of a scholar who's page was created way too early in his career. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:29, 30 October 2009 (UTC).
Delete. Enough achievement not yet there. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:32, 31 October 2009 (UTC).
Delete per WP:PROF. Clear-cut. Eusebeus (talk) 18:48, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete, not notable by any standard. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.