Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seance (band)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep.(non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

=[[Seance (band)]]=

:{{la|Seance (band)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Seance_(band) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Seance (band)}})

Does not meet WP:BAND. The only source for the article is its label and therefore not independent. The label it is on is, however, independent. MSJapan (talk) 05:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep perhaps considering the current coverage. Delete for now at best as this has never had any apparent signs of likely better notability and searches so far at Blabbermouth, Terrorizer and Kerrang! found nothing better than [https://books.google.com/books?id=jRRvfWp95FIC&pg=PA414&dq=seance+Linkoping+Sweden+death+metal+band&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjNouzMwIzKAhVEPCYKHQ46BOEQ6AEIMDAA#v=onepage&q=seance%20Linkoping%20Sweden%20death%20metal%20band&f=false this] (hardly enough, passing mentions). SwisterTwister talk 01:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment: I'm finding some stuff out there to assert notability. I've added some coverage to the article. There are some other things like [http://www.metalcrypt.com/pages/review.php?revid=5022 this] that I'm unsure of, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

:*I also found [http://www.metalinjection.net/podcasts/heavy-metal-happy-hour-4-franks-2009 this]. The site looks like it'd be a RS, but I haven't listened to the show yet to see if there's any actual coverage or if they're just playing the albums. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep. This isn't the strongest keep, but I think that there's enough to assert notability for the band. We have two reviews from AllMusic, one from Exclaim!, and one from MetalReviews. They were also mentioned at length in a Bazillion Points book from what I could see. Other than the one album, I don't know that their individual albums need articles, but I think there's enough for the band as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep. Enough coverage for an article. --Michig (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep - I agree with Swister's and TokyoGirl's assessment. Enough coverage from the reviews to show the band barely passes notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 17:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.