Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Lletget

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coren (talk) 00:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

=[[Sebastian Lletget]]=

:{{la|Sebastian Lletget}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sebastian_Lletget Stats])

:({{Find sources|Sebastian Lletget}})

Article about a footballer who has not played in a fully pro league and also fails WP:GNG. – Michael (talk) 20:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 21:01, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete - He has not received significant coverage and has not played in a fully pro league, meaning this article fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment – Yesterday, I nominated this page for a CSD A7, but it was denied by Monty845 and this was the reason....

:"Playing for West Ham United, a professional football team in the top national league is a claim of importance, may even be enough for notability"

:And I'm pretty sure that's not true. – Michael (talk) 22:32, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

::Well, I sorted everything out with him regarding whether or not this met the criteria of CSD A7. It turned out it didn't meet the criteria. – Michael (talk) 03:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

:::The denying editor was right, "importance" is of a lower standard than "notability". Cheers. – Kosm1fent 08:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. – Michael (talk) 23:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

It's incredible in every place that have a article nominated to be deleted, Sir Sputnik is there. He lives only for delete article instead of create it.--SirEdimon (talk) 21:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

::I think we should give credit to Sir Sputnik for doing an incredible job on deleting articles about non-notable BLP's. Mentoz86 (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

he don't care about nothing. He just want to delete.--SirEdimon (talk) 22:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete Per nominator, not notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - article is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means that the article fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due as there isn't significant coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment. WP:GNG is a subjective criteria, but it's really fails in the WP:FOOTY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SirEdimon (talk • contribs) 21:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.