Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastien Ibeagha

:{{la|Sebastien Ibeagha}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sebastien_Ibeagha Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sebastien Ibeagha}})

Re-creation of article that was previously deleted per WP:PROD. Concern was that the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. That concern remains valid. – Michael (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 00:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

I am the creator of the article. I thought that the Danish and Icelandic clubs were first division clubs, which I now know they are not. I definitely did not think he qualified under WP:GNG, but I seem to be incorrect about his meeting the requirements of WP:NFOOTBALL. He will almost certainly see some playing time, but for the same reasons that guys like Mael Corboz don't have pages yet, then you would seem to be correct in deleting the page. Padsquad2010 (talk) 00:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Could be notable in the future and no problems recreating if he plays in the MLS, but a case of WP:TOOSOON at best at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL --Sabri76'^talk 21:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - Per above. Even the author (Padsquad2010) admits that the subject of the article is not yet notable. Inter&anthro (talk) 04:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• SNOW Delete as questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.