Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SecureChange

=[[SecureChange]]=

:{{la|SecureChange}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|SecureChange}})

Article was dePRODded. PROD reason was "Non-notable ephemeral project. Most of the references in the misleadingly-impressive-looking list were published before this project existed and obviously do not even mention it. The remainder are not independent (the project's website or brief presentations at meetings by project members)." Most pre-project references have now been removed, but the lack of notability has not been addressed: Project members have produced some scientific articles or presented some results at scientific meetings. That is what academics do routinely and nothing out of the ordinary. No evidence that this project has generated any interest from outside of the circle of participants. Crusio (talk) 10:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Tom Morris (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete Just as little evcidence of notability as the other similararticles we've been deleting. DGG ( talk ) 23:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - I found very little other coverage aside from this mention [http://newsblaze.com/story/2009022405004800006.mwir/topstory.html here].SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.