Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantic broker

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Semantic broker}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Semantic broker}})

Fails WP:GNG. Not a single WP:RS found even for a redirect Clenpr (talk) 18:03, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:15, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
• Redirect to Semantic Web. There's a good number of academic sources using the concept in relation to Semantic Web technologies. MarioGom (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
• :*Redirect Agree with MarioGom, this is an easy redirect to Semantic Web.
• :Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 22:45, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
• :@MarioGom, given the recent delete !vote below, would you be able to share any of these sources? Or do you agree that a delete would be fine? -- asilvering (talk) 13:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
• ::Delete should be fine. I saw a few results in Google Scholar back then, but really didn't took enough time to verify if they where circular. MarioGom (talk) 17:59, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
• Merge wth Semantic mapper as preferred WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
• :This looks like a candidate to merge with Semantic Web too. Sub-concept, wholly unsourced. MarioGom (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

:

• Delete: Unsourced dictionary entry that has been tagged since December 2009 as not having any sources. I DO NOT like the wording as just being an "easy redirect" without sourcing. This is not supported by any policy, guideline, or even essay. All I could find, that was not circular, was [https://www.saic.com/perspectives/data-ontologies-and-semantic-frameworks-will-improve-systems-engineering-ecosystem-connections semantic broker], [https://www.anyquest.ai/blog/cognitive-applications-and-semantic-brokers/ Cognitive Applications and Semantic Brokers], and [https://everything.explained.today/Semantic_mapper/#google_vignette Semantic mapper explained]. The last one indicates that "A semantic mapper is an essential component of a semantic broker and one tool that is enabled by the Semantic Web technologies". This means if there is a Redirect (as ATD per {{u| MarioGom}} and my secondary choice), or if some encyclopedia context could be added from the above sources, a "Merge", it is more probable to be to Semantic web. "Delete", "Merge", or "Redirect", are indicative that an article should not have a stand alone page. No one will likely contest a closer chosen target from the suggestions. -- Otr500 (talk) 13:41, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
• Delete: Well, I just tagged MarioGom above, but then I had a look at the article and its history. There's no need for an ATD here; we're losing basically nothing in terms of both content and page history. I'm not convinced that a redirect will be terribly helpful for anyone looking for this, either. Better to just let people get a search result isntead of wordlessly sending them somewhere else. -- asilvering (talk) 13:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.