Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantic infiltration

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. CSD G5. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 10:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

=[[Semantic infiltration]]=

:{{la|Semantic infiltration}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Semantic_infiltration Stats])

:({{Find sources|Semantic infiltration}})

Created by blocked sock that uses Wikipedia to push a POV. I originally limited myself to recommending severe cuts to the article, as the topic existed in reliable sources, but I've now come to think that we would be better served with WP:TNT, since almost no sources in the article meet our standards and it appears still to be full of original synthesis. Let a competent and neutral user handle the topic if he or she so desires. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.