Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbenda

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Serbenda}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Serbenda}})

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 13:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 13:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 13:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

• Comment: I don't know whether this social/political type is notable, and so cannot comment directly on the that aspect of this discussion. But I would highlight the actual text of NOTADICTIONARY: "a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written... [This can lead to a misunderstanding] that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent." This looks like it may be a stub, rather than a dictionary entry as such. Cnilep (talk) 02:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

:::To answer your question: No, the word is not socio-politically notable. I'm sure it may be referenced in passing in several reliable sources, but WP:ENN. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

• Delete It's neither notable, well-structured as references and the content go or per WP:NAD. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 20:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.