Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Hamm Productions

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No third-party sources at all. Bishonen | talk 20:14, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Seth Hamm Productions]]=

:{{la|Seth Hamm Productions}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Seth_Hamm_Productions Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Seth Hamm Productions}})

No independent evidence of notability. Does not satisfy general notability or web notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Comment Had tagged for speedy deletion. A7 tag was removed. Going for AFD rather than retrying A7. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  • See Original Animation on YouTube, by same author, which states that this channel has 4 subscribers. That isn't notability unless an independent source has observed something interesting about the production company. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 20:50, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 20:50, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete. No news coverage. Blythwood (talk) 03:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.