Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seymour Brunson

:{{la|Seymour Brunson}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Seymour Brunson}})

Delete, articles one claim to notability is that there was a speech at his funeral by Joseph Smith with new doctrine for the church. Per my understanding this makes him notable for one thing and that while he might rate mention on that doctrines page nothing in the article in the article imho stated notability beyond this. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

::I would say that Brunson being a person who brought charges leading to Oliver Cowdery's excommunication justifies him having an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

:::It is defintely a interesting point. I'm going to think on that one for a little and if I agree I will withdraw, it's actually a good rationale. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

• Weak keep. Although I cannot find a vast amount of information on the subject, the two separate connections to Smith and Cowdery help him to squeak by WP:BASIC. Location (talk) 00:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.