Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahzad Ali Najmi

:{{la|Shahzad Ali Najmi}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shahzad_Ali_Najmi Stats])

:({{Find sources|Shahzad Ali Najmi}})

Apparently non-notable. [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Shahzad+Ali+Najmi%22+site:news.google.com/newspapers&num=50&safe=off&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ei=puLHU_zTDKWs0QWi7oGQDw&ved=0CA4Q_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=680 0 hits] on G-News, [http://www.google.it/search?q=%22Shahzad+Ali+Najmi%22&num=50&safe=off&hl=en&site=webhp&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ei=nOPHU9zDA6qX1AWnpIBo&ved=0CA4Q_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=680 no useful hits] on G-books, the two visible refs in the article are about a book, not the person. The Khizria Order doesn't seem to be notable either. But perhaps there are references in other languages that show his notability? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

• Delete I worked to clean this up, but in the end I just don't see that there's anything here of note. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

• Weak Keep I appreciate User:WikiDan61's efforts to clean this article up. Shahzad Ali Najmi is [http://beta.jang.com.pk/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=150224 mentioned] in the Daily Jang; in addition, he is also [http://www.express.pk/story/221059/ discussed] in the Daily Express, which are both reliable sources. As such, they seem to establish his notability, thus passing WP:N. However, when I performed [https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=%22%D8%B4%DB%81%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%AF+%D8%B9%D9%84%DB%8C+%D9%86%D8%AC%D9%85%DB%8C%22&start=0 a search] for the subject's Urdu name, {{Nastaliq|شہزاد علی نجمی}}, I was unable to find much more. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 07:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
• Keep Reliable reference contained in the article, but it is in Urdu language. --George David Wilson (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)--George David Wilson (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC) — George David Wilson (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep the Nifaaz-e-Urdu, the Daily Jang, the Daily Express All the three are considered very reliable sources in Pakistan. --Nida Farooqi (talk) 09:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC) — Nida Farooqi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Comment Regarding Anupam's comments: a brief publication announcement and a single book review (included within a column of several book reviews) does not appear to reach the required level of significant coverage. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 10:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
• Keep In News of The Daily Jang mentioned that the writer of "Najmi Healing Energy" Book is Dr. Syed Shahzad Ali Najmi. It's proves he is a writer. In comments to the Daily Express Mentioned that Dr. Syed Shahzad Ali Najmi a writer of "Najmi Healing Energy" Book that is the first Islamic Healing Energy Book in the World & also Mentioned Dr. Syed Shahzad Ali Najmi is a murid of Khwaja Shamsuddin Azeemi that proves his contact to the Sufism etc.--Dr. Alan Godlas (talk) 13:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC) — Dr. Alan Godlas (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Comment Again, I ask for evidence of significant coverage. So far, none has been produced. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
• Delete No significant enough coverage to meet our notability bar. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 17:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
• Keep I think that references which are given in article are reliable and significant. --Mhetab Aalam Mhetab (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC) — Mhetab Aalam Mhetab (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete. No significant coverage. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC).
• Keep I protest to all administrators of wikipedia that to include this article in wikipedia, references which are given in article are reliable and significant. --Syed Kamran Ali Romi (talk) 05:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC) — Syed Kamran Ali Romi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep I think that evidence of reliable & significant references have been confirmed, so the article should be included in Wikipedia.--Peaceful Peaceful (talk) 14:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC) — Peaceful Peaceful (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete - Subject lacks significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources, therefore it does not merit a Wikipedia article. It fails Wikipedia general notability guideline and Wikipedia notability guideline for people. I see, tons of SPAs here, not sure if there have been a SPI regarding this. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.