Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahzada Akhund

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:14, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

=[[Shahzada Akhund]]=

:{{la|Shahzada Akhund}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Shahzada Akhund}})

Fails WP:BIO, completely based on one story. There are no other sources about this person, the only book listed at Google is a copy of Wikipedia articles[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Shahzada+Akhund%22&um=1&psj=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=sw#q=%22Shahzada%20Akhund%22&hl=en&prmd=ivo&psj=1&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp&psj=1&fp=267856ed3ee60de5], Google News archives give nothing[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Shahzada+Akhund%22&um=1&psj=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=sw#q=%22Shahzada+Akhund%22&hl=en&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&prmd=ivo&source=lnt&sa=X&psj=1&ei=5UQCTdGKBY2fOubPzKYB&ved=0CA8QpwU&fp=46a3aa67685d478a], and regular Google has very few results as well([http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Shahzada+Akhund%22&um=1&psj=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=sw#q=%22Shahzada+Akhund%22&hl=en&prmd=ivo&psj=1&ei=CUUCTZT9AYGaOojv3KcB&start=90&sa=N&fp=267856ed3ee60de5 73], but only [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Shahzada+Akhund%22&um=1&psj=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=sw#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=%22Shahzada+Akhund%22+-wikipedia+-%22is+a+citizen+of+Afghanistan+believed+to+have%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&psj=1&fp=267856ed3ee60de5 4] left when you filter away Wikipedia). Fram (talk) 15:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Delete as per nom. IQinn (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.