Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakurspeare
=[[Shakurspeare]]=
:{{la|Shakurspeare}} – (
:({{findsources|Shakurspeare}})
Disputed prod. Othan than the website of record label, there are no reliable sources of this upcoming album. Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Karppinen (talk) 17:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Karppinen (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep There is a substantial and reliable information in following sources: [http://www.allhiphop.com/stories/news/archive/2009/07/29/21854242.aspx allhip-hop], [http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/07/30/news-ticker-phil-spector-madonna-tupac-shakur-beck/ Rolling Stone], [http://www.nzherald.co.nz/music/news/article.cfm?c_id=264&objectid=10604430&pnum=3 New Zealand Herald], [http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2009/07/earliest-tupac-recordings-to-be-released.html Paste Magazine], [http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/07/how-long-will-they-mourn-me-2pacs-earliest-recordings-to-see-the-light-of-day.html LA Times music blog] (etc). WP:CRYSTAL is not applicable in this case, in my opinion. --Vejvančický (talk) 22:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Weak delete: The sources mentioned above were published earlier last year, with no recent confirmation of such album. WP:CRYSTAL might apply with the fact that no recent details of the album is being made. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per sources linked by user:Vejvančický.--PinkBull 04:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.