Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanglie Zhou
=[[Shanglie Zhou]]=
:{{la|Shanglie Zhou}} – (
:({{Find sources|Shanglie Zhou}})
Artist's CV (linked from the article) shows an allegedly impressive resume of awards, exhibitions, &c., but I see insufficient verifiable evidence of notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 02:14, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HueSatLum 19:01, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 20:27, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Seems to be notable (participated in notable events, there is a book about her), but the article seems to be a copyvio [http://www.winteredition.eu/2011/bio/e_bio_shanglie.html].--Ymblanter (talk) 06:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – On the notability front, this article does not meet the notability requirements. There are no reliable secondary sources available on the character and reading the material that is available about her only confirms my verdict of non-notable. I noticed that she is Chinese and lives in Belgium – why not check if there are articles in those languages? As for the article itself, it is poorly written and poorly grammatically structured and would need to be re-written in the unlikely circumstances that it is notable. BarkingNigel (talk) 12:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.