Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Chadwick (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 04:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Sheila Chadwick]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Chadwick}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Sheila Chadwick}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sheila_Chadwick_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sheila Chadwick}})

Hi! After spending some considerable time looking for reliable secondary sources, it appears the subject fails our general notability guidelines. I could be wrong, and hoping I am, but, I do not believe Sheila Chadwick meets our guidelines for inclusion. This article was also created as an autobiography. Thanks for your review and contributions. Missvain (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete, agree with the nominator, this person does not pass WP:GNG, as far as I can tell not a single reliable secondary source has given her any coverage at all, much less significant coverage. And yeah, the article was very obviously created by someone who, if not the subject themselves, definitely had a close relationship with them. Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete. I can't find any sources either. Tacyarg (talk) 09:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete a non-notable writer. This appears to be a different person than the previous deletion discussion was about, since I do not see any mention of the publications the last person was editor-in-cheif of, but I cannot be sure.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Also finding trouble with sources, however for sources that are there I still believe she is notable. She has been shown to work on multiple platforms, has published, and has a web series with over ten thousand followers. --Gim0031 (talk) 11:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

::There are YouTubers with over 10 million subscribers that are not notable, having 10 thousand followers is nothing when it comes to establishing notability. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete. I also can't find sources online that would show GNG. 67.243.20.177 (talk) 11:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete. No indication from reliable sources that WP:GNG is met. --Kinu t/c 22:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.