Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherry Dooley
=[[Sherry Dooley]]=
:{{la|Sherry Dooley}} – (
:({{Find sources|Sherry Dooley}})
Not notable. Both listed refs are from a student publication at U of Ore, and as such are not reliable sources for the purposes of notability (see WP:RSN). GNews search just turned up one hit, from the Portland newspaper on local artists. No GHits other than social/youtube/self-published sites. GregJackP Boomer! 18:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I was uncomfotable speedying it, but happy to endorse deletion in AFD. The JPStalk to me 19:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
:{{#if:yes|Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. |{{error|This template must be substituted!}}}} • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
:{{#if:yes|Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. |{{error|This template must be substituted!}}}} • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. I found a couple of hits in the news search for the Portland Tribune but under the heading of "Culture listings". The articles are no longer available and the heading leads me to beleive that these are very likely gallery show listings in the newspaper. There is also a paywalled http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-166291598.html result in the Daily Press that I was able to pull up with my Highbeam account. For those who do not have Highbeam access, the article is just a correction for a mistaken picture caption from another article. I was unable to find the other article. -- Whpq (talk) 16:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: unable to find any significant coverage in any source. —EncMstr (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.