Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shilpa Mehta

{{ns:0|B}}

:{{la|Shilpa Mehta}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Shilpa Mehta}})

I would say delete this, and if someone has more to say that this, the article can be re-created. But I doubt there is anything more to say D O N D E groovily Talk to me 01:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
• Keep There is more to say. Sad as the nominated article is in its current state, the individual appears to meet both WP:GNG[http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Shilpa+Mehta%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a][http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Shilpa+Mehta%22&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=np] and WP:ENT.[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0576577/filmotype] Rather than toss an improvable article, why not actually improve it through regular editing? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:34, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Mehta is a fairly common south asian name, and I don't see in indication in MichaelQ's list of Google results that these are all for the same person, let alone this person. Delete per nom. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
• :While "Mehta" might perhaps be a common surname, Shilpa Mehta seems a bit more unique. Since others have not, I'll dig through them and add sources to the article.Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:00, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.