Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinee World 2014

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:31, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Shinee World 2014]]=

:{{la|Shinee World 2014}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shinee_World_2014 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Shinee World 2014}})

There is really no information that suggests anything notable besides the fact that the tour happened. The only worth-mentioning information is the number of attendance, but even so, this info has already been indicated within the main Shinee's article, per WP:NTOUR. TerryAlex (talk) 02:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (say) @ 21:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (express) @ 21:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (gossip) @ 22:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep for now: Has reliable sources and pretty descriptive. But it does need more reliable sources though. Tibbydibby (talk) 00:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 04:38, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment {{ping|Tibbydibby}} I agree that this one has more content than most of these tour articles, and about the sources. The first 5 references are from official sites before the tour started. In other words, they are PR. Two of the others were Soompi, which according to WikiProject_Korea/Reliable_sources (which I found via your user page, thanks) is not considered an RS for K-pop articles. That leaves only one possibly reliable source. This is pretty thin. Is there a good reason why this tour can't be described in a paragraph or so in their own article? – Margin1522 (talk) 14:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

::{{u|Margin1522}} Most K-pop tours can/should only be described in a paragraph within the main artists' articles because there are hardly ever enough sources/coverage.--TerryAlex (talk) 17:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

:{{ping|Margin1522}} You do have a point there. I was just suggesting that it's only a Keep for a temporary period (maybe a few more months) while people find other reliable sources of the tour (from various Japanese news outlets preferably). If the article can't be improved by then, then I'll support the AfD. Tibbydibby (talk) 23:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Again, fails WP:NTOUR. Significant coverage means significant coverage. Most tours really do fail WP:NTOUR. This one's not even done yet - how can anyone attest to its notability or legacy? Despite the amount of content in the article, a lot of it isn't Wikipedia-worthy. It's details about announcements, straight from the firm's PR materials. Listen, I like Shinee quite a lot, but it's crazy how many Shinee-related articles there are on Wikipedia about things that truly are not notable. There's simply nothing notable about this tour - it's just another kpop tour. Shinyang-i (talk) 08:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 01:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. Not seeing any in-depth coverage to demonstrate notability as specified by WP:NTOUR. --DAJF (talk) 00:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.