Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoplet (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Shoplet]]=

AfDs for this article:

:{{la|1=Shoplet}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Shoplet}})

Fails WP:GNG BryceM2001 (talk) 17:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

:Should be WP:SALT ed as well. Multiple creations were deleted. BryceM2001 (talk) 17:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Already at AFD, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Delete: Lack of in-depth coverage. Mentions here and there of the website, but they are almost always routine or (at best, as in the CNN Money article) interviews with minimal commentary. Not enough independent, in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Shazback (talk) 23:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete Agree with above, none of the sources meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.