Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shotgun Man

{{ns:0|}}

:{{la|Shotgun Man}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Shotgun Man}})

Urban legend. The sources do not make the existence of this character more likely than not. Furthermore, is it just me, or does this article not make much sense? Gerbelzodude99 (talk) 06:03, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

::Note: nominator is single purpose account with only this AfD to his/her name, can we just close this? The existence of the character is not an AfD reason. The Easter Bunny does NOT exist, not even a debate. Yet I bet he has an article. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 06:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

:::The eostre bunny has a much more significant impact on western culture than "shotgun man." Gerbelzodude99 (talk) 06:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

::::Plenty of evolutionary biologists articles, even though none so notable as Darwin. Your point? --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 06:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

• Keep and expand. There are plenty of books that mention Shotgun Man [http://books.google.com/books?ei=qZkPS62nBMOknQfiotXDAw&ct=result&q=%22Shotgun+Man%22+chicago&btnG=Search+Books|here]. Gobonobo ^{T C} 09:35, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Can we speedy close this? It's a single purpose account bogus nomination. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 16:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

• Keep and expand per Gobonobo. Crafty (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per Gobonobo and because the nomination does notappear to have been made in good faith. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. I would nac this, but I don't have the cojones to do so. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 22:55, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.