Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShowClix

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

=[[:ShowClix]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|ShowClix}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ShowClix Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|ShowClix}})

Fails WP:GNG, seems WP:PEACOCKy. Majavah (t/c) 14:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Majavah (t/c) 14:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Majavah (t/c) 14:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep Coverage Found After a search, Added to the Reference List. Article needs improvement. twerk000 —Preceding undated comment added 14:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep - [https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomiogeron/2012/01/06/showclix-pays-ticket-buyers-to-promote-events/#73284bc45837] and [https://www.post-gazette.com/business/tech-news/2017/07/31/Digital-ticketing-solution-ShowClix-makes-an-exit-Providence-Strategic-Growth/stories/201707310127] both pop up in addition to the !vote above. --MuZemike 23:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep. Extremely peacocky in a few places, but the links on the page as well as the link added by MuZemike seem to include some non-routine material and could fit with WP:CORPDEPTH. 67.243.20.177 (talk) 10:54, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

:*For what it's worth, the "breaking burning man" incident last year is pretty funny. (I also cut out the peacocky text, on the fence on if the awards are worth keeping). 67.243.20.177 (talk) 11:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:53, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 16:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep: "Seems peacocky" is solved by editing, not deleting. The Burning Man coverage gives the company enough RS to pass. -- Toughpigs (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.