Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shramik Vikas Sangathan
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 18:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Shramik Vikas Sangathan]]=
:{{la|Shramik Vikas Sangathan}} – (
:Shramik Vikas Sangathan ({{Find sources AFD|Shramik Vikas Sangathan}})
:श्रमिक विकास संगठन ({{Find sources AFD|श्रमिक विकास संगठन}})
The article fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 18:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 18:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The search with the Hindi keywords brought up a good amount of news articles, that are covering this organization and its activities in several states of India. I have posted several news links to expand the article on the Talk:Shramik Vikas Sangathan. Here are a few of them. [https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi-news/eyes-on-ls-polls-aap-forms-eight-labour-groups-to-strengthen-cadre-at-grassroots/story-DBZmWvStgvxCBRKG71qNZI.html], [https://aajtak.intoday.in/story/labour-conference-delhi-aap-cm-arvind-kejriwal-lg-1-1000146.html], [https://www.jagran.com/delhi/new-delhi-city-ncr-aap-delhi-18907708.html], [https://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/metro/delhi/other-news/aam-aadmi-partys-labor-organization/articleshow/67777447.cms], [http://image.epaper.navbharattimes.com/epaperimages//29092016//29092016-md-ga-10.pdf], [http://www.millenniumpost.in/aaps-labour-organisation-launches-signature-campaign-163542] [https://www.dailyudaipur.com/%E0%A4%86%E0%A4%AE-%E0%A4%86%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%80-%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%80-%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%A5%E0%A4%AE-%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95-%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF/][https://www.sarkarimirror.com/49444-2/] [https://livecities.in/bihar/labor-wages-to-the-workers-in-bihar-on-the-lines-of-delhi-government-aap/][https://www.prabhatkhabar.com/news/siliguri/story/1239883.html][https://specialcoveragenews.in/news/state-news/uttar-pradesh-news/lucknow-news/-national-co-ordination-committee-member-svs-says-54355] ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 07:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
::I have reviewed all these sources by you and none of them are passing WP:ORGCRIT. These sources are of passing mention or WP:ROUTINE coverage of different statement from the office bearers or party event from local newspapers.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep {{u|DBigXray}} has provided extensive reliable sourcing on the talk page of the article. It's an officially registered trade union, with representatives on bipartite regional boards, for example [http://it.delhigovt.nic.in/writereaddata/egaz20186338.pdf Employees State Insurance Corporation]. Easily meets ORG, UCS and AfD is not cleanup. --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.