Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri Phanishwar Nath Renu Engineering College

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Shri Phanishwar Nath Renu Engineering College}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Shri Phanishwar Nath Renu Engineering College}})

Fails to satisfy the requirements of WP:NSCHOOL / WP:GNG, lacks reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The article appears to be entirely based on No original research. DMySon (talk) 07:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 07:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 07:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 07:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 07:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

• Keep It is one of the 38 state government engineering colleges of Bihar state (List of institutions of higher education in Bihar). All other 37 colleges have articles. It is not a commercial college, it is a government-funded institution. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. — GargAvinash ^talk 08:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete from what I can tell there's only like 2 reliable references about it, one from The Hindu and Navbharat Times, The Hindu article is extremely trivial though. Since it just covers the college in passing. Outside of that everything else is primary, or basic school listings. As far as WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, the outcome of the RfC in 2017 is clear that arguments based on it should be avoided in deletion discussions. In the meantime the fact that all the other colleges have articles is WP:OTHERSTUFF and should probably also not factor into this. I'm sure some of the other articles will be nominated for deletion eventually. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

• Keep Degree-awarding institutions are generally notable. Coverage does not have to be In English, or online. Its only 3 years old and more coverage is very likely to develop. Rathfelder (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

• Keep per above. --Vaco98 (talk) 03:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete The Araria News source is not much more then a newsflash about the oping of buildinfs. Not something substantial. As far a I can see, the rest are listings. Given the small number of intakes, it still a very tiny institution. Looks promotional too, due to the emphasis on admission. The Banner talk 23:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.