Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuttee

{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse top|bg=#F3F9FF|1=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuttee|padding=1px}}|}}

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

=[[Shuttee]]=

:{{la|Shuttee}} ([{{fullurl:Shuttee|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuttee}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{find sources|Shuttee}})

This is an unsourced neologism, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PROD removed by author. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Delete teh silly thing. Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Really not much else to say about this, is there? freshacconci talktalk 13:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete unsourced, not quite non-sense but nearly vandalism. I really wish neologisms like this were speediable. it would save so many editors, so much time in these AFDs.--RadioFan (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse bottom}}|}}