Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Motors

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Sigma Motors]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Sigma Motors}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sigma_Motors Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sigma Motors}})

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 11:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ceethekreator (talk) 19:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Article has a previous removed WP:PROD, so soft deletion isn't an option; giving this another shot at input for a consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 19:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep I added a few references to the article. There are more to be found. I find that there is some notability and so therefore I !vote keep. Wm335td (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:HEY. This article can be improved. VF9 (talk) 22:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment - fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Closing admin should observe that added sources are not WP:RS. Störm (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete Agree with nom, none of the references are good. I've checked for additional good sources but I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 20:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep As of 19 November 2019, this article has The Express Tribune (newspaper), Asianet News and (3) other improved references. Today I updated and gave new references and before me (3) references were given by Wm335td above on 13 November 2019.Ngrewal1 (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Passes WP:SIGCOV per the following sources including two peer reviewed journal articles:
  1. {{cite work|title=Direct-Drive Linear Motion Lives!|author=Bartos, Frank|work=Control Engineering|date=April 2003|volume=50(4)|page=34}} (peer reviewed)
  2. {{cite work|title=Motoman - palletizing in the freezer|work=Industrial Robot: An International Journal|date= December 1, 2003|volume=30(6)}} (peer reviewed)
  3. {{cite work|title=UK keen to up trade links with Pakistan|work=The Financial Daily|date= June 15, 2012}}
  4. {{cite work|title=Deputy high commissioner says UK committed to building trade ties with Pakistan|work=BBC Monitoring International Reports|date=June 14, 2012}}
  5. {{cite work|title=HASCOL CHAIRMAN TALKS ABOUT BALOCHISTAN'S ENERGY POTENTIAL|author=Saeedi, Tariq|work=Pakistan & Gulf Economist, Aug 2011|page=19-20}}
  6. {{cite work|title=Democracy can spare a few mediocre MPs|author=Mckie, David|work=The Guardian (1959-2003)|date= May 24, 1995|page=15}}
  7. {{cite work|title=The first look: Motoman pushes the envelope of robot development|author=Vasilash, Gary|work=Production|date=November 1995|volume=107(11|page=35}}

Hope this helps.4meter4 (talk) 02:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.