Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh Rajputs (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Sikh Rajputs]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh Rajputs}}

:{{la|Sikh Rajputs}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sikh_Rajputs_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sikh Rajputs}})

The article has no content other than one name, and even that is contested (sources, all offline, appear to vary on his social group identity). What's left is the line "Sikh Rajputs are followers of Sikhism belonging to the Rajput caste" which is a mere tautology. regentspark (comment) 19:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Delete: There is not enough academic work detailing “Sikh Rajputs” as a distinct group. Most references just detail that some Rajputs converted to Sikhism which is not really worthy of an article. Other Rajput subgroup pages like Sindhi Rajputs, Punjabi Rajputs, Bihari Rajputs have also been deleted.31.100.154.51 (talk) 14:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 02:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy Delete. Fails WP:GNG. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 02:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Comment. Very little online but did find this ref in the The Indian Express, [https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chandigarh/punjab-cabinet-to-discuss-rolling-back-backward-status-for-sikh-rajputs-5000521/]. Britishfinance (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.