Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silas Santos Silva

:{{la|Silas Santos Silva}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Silas_Santos_Silva Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Silas Santos Silva}})

Don't let the large amount of references fool you, not a single one of them shows that this person is notable. Most are either dead links or links to his profile, ie a self-published source. Also, autobiographical article. Pishcal — ♣ 20:21, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. Agree, most of the provided references are either broken or personal blogs and profiles. Searching provides no indication of general notability. Bordwall(^talk⁄_ctrb) 20:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - I usually stay away from academics as I'm not an expert unless it's obvious the subject is not notable and it seems this is the case. News, Books, browser and Scholar found nothing to suggest notability and all of his works at recent and nothing there suggests notability as well. SwisterTwister talk 19:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.