Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SilverStone Technology

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:SilverStone Technology}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SilverStone Technology}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:SilverStone Technology}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 05:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

=[[:SilverStone Technology]]=

:{{la|1=SilverStone Technology}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=SilverStone Technology}})

Fails WP:CORP. 4 of the 5 sources are its own website. Coverage seems mainly limited to product reviews. LibStar (talk) 04:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Taiwan. AllyD (talk) 06:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.