Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon withers

:{{la|Simon withers}} ([{{fullurl:Simon withers|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon withers}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I think if his work were notable, someone would be saying something about it, and looking quickly, I didn't see any hits at the [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Simon+withers%22+&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&scoring=a news archives] for this artist. - Dank (push to talk) 16:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. Clear A7 candidate. If he's notable, someone's welcome to re-create the article. This is just a resume entry. Hairhorn (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - local Nottingham artist with a strong Internet presence in self-submitted artist directories but no significant coverage in independent secondary sources that I could find. One self-published catalogue (2001) on Gbooks, nothing on GScholar or GNews. Fails WP:BIO. Enki H. (talk) 03:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. The article's author has blanked the page, so it has now been tagged for a G7 speedy deletion. Dawn Bard (talk) 13:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. deleted - can be closed. Enki H. (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.