Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simonds of Botesdale

:{{la|Simonds of Botesdale}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Simonds of Botesdale}})

Delete This page is about a local bus company. People would not look for it on the web and not on Wikipedia. Highhousefarm1 (talk) 21:31, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

:(Fixed nom. Please close seven days after 12:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC) -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC))

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

• Keep Much as I hate buses, this company operates scheduled bus routes in Norfolk and Suffolk. I believe that it therefore is notable enough to sustain an article on Wikipedia. Mjroots (talk) 19:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
• Kepp WE ARE LOSSING THE REGIONS WORTH OF GOOD BUS PAGES. WE NEED TO SAVE IT NOW!! They are all notable. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 07:42, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

• Keep Companies that operate scheduled public transport are generally considered notable because they generate enormous amounts of local third-party notice from reliable sources (including complaints in the local papers, but that's life). I've done a basic article cleanup. --NellieBly (talk) 02:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.