Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisters Grimm (Ltd)

=[[Sisters Grimm (Ltd)]]=

:{{la|Sisters Grimm (Ltd)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sisters_Grimm_(Ltd) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Sisters Grimm (Ltd)}})

This company fails WP:CORP - the sources currently in the article are IMDB and the company's homepage, and I couldn't find any other sources online. Note: there was a recent AfD discussion about one of the co-founders of this production company at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ella Spira. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 05:48, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Ella_Spira#Achievements where the company is mentioned - It appears that there has never been any reliable third-party sources. I found the company's website (the article's external link is dead) [http://www.sisters-grimm.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13&Itemid=3 here] and provides reviews at the "press" section but they appear to be insignificant. SwisterTwister talk 22:46, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ21 13:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


  • Redirect until referencing can be found. Masses of non-reliable stuff out there, but I couldn't see anything that looked like RS. Peridon (talk) 14:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - there's nothing out there. A simple google for '"Sisters Grimm (Ltd)" -wikipedia -wordpress -facebook -answers -youtube' actually returned only 48 results (though promising thousands). Many of those are publicity feeds; nothing usable. Great name for a company though, I wish them well. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.