Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sitaramula Kalyanam Chuthamu Raarandi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Sitaramula Kalyanam Chuthamu Raarandi]]=

:{{la|1=Sitaramula Kalyanam Chuthamu Raarandi}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Sitaramula Kalyanam Chuthamu Raarandi}})

Fails WP:GNG. Reference 1 is a minor [https://telugu.webdunia.com/article/telugu-cinema-news/ram-priyanka-media-entertainments-production-n0-2-starts-116042200019_1.html announcement] on production details, only five sentences and nowhere near WP:SIGCOV. [https://updateodisha.com/2017/03/22/sabyasachis-upcoming-movie-sita-ramanka-bahaghara-53566/ ref 2] is an announcement column, only with six sentences of coverage. [https://movie.webindia123.com/film/eventgallery/11131/ram-priyanka-media-entertainments-movie-opening-photos/ Ref 3] is a non-SIGCOV image gallery, [https://www.vaartha.com/%E0%B0%B0%E0%B0%BE%E0%B0%AE%E0%B1%8D%E2%80%8C-%E0%B0%AA%E0%B1%8D%E0%B0%B0%E0%B0%BF%E0%B0%AF%E0%B0%BE%E0%B0%82%E0%B0%95%E0%B0%BE-%E0%B0%AE%E0%B1%80%E0%B0%A1%E0%B0%BF%E0%B0%AF%E0%B0%BE-%E0%B0%AA/ ref 4] is another single paragraph announcement, [https://www.idlebrain.com/news/functions1/muhurat-rampriyankamediaentertainments.html ref 5] is a routine press release stating that production started while listing cast and production details, [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/oriya/movie-details/sita-rama-nka-bahaghara-kali-jugare/movieshow/61218094.cms ref 6] contains a synopsis (plot-only descriptions are non-SIGCOV) along with user ratings and minor non-SIGCOV videos. [https://www.ragalahari.com/tollywood-news-2021-february/162130/seetharamula-kalyanam-chothamu-rarandi-gets-a-good-response-on-ott Ref 7] is also non-SIGCOV, being only two very short paragraphs routinely listing the cast along with a single sentence describing it was well-received by the audience (not critics) in a questionably WP:RS source with little editorial policies. Other refs are unreliable databases (Amazon, IMDB). Therefore, all of these refs are too short to be SIGCOV, and also fall under {{tq|directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability}}, my WP:BEFORE search did not find more sources counting towards GNG, NFILM criteria are also failed. VickKiang (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 21:59, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Delete. {{ping|VickKiang}} There is another version of the article titled Sita Ramanka Bahaghara Kali Jugare. Do you think that article can also be deleted for the same reasons? This user is a COI as they only create articles for Rajendra Bharadwaj films. DareshMohan (talk) 22:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
:Probably yes IMO, I will have a look and if I couldn't find refs per WP:BEFORE I will AfD. VickKiang (talk) 00:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
::AfDed. VickKiang (talk) 08:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Delete no reviews found in search, fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 13:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.