Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skagit Bicycle Club

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Skagit Bicycle Club}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Skagit_Bicycle_Club Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Skagit Bicycle Club}})

Ineligible for PROD as one was declined years ago. This fails WP:NORG, the only reason I didn't opt for {{db-club}} is that it uses the word "major", which is a credible claim of significance. SITH (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 15:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete. Not a single solid RS on this organization. How an article on a 200-member organisation survived over a decade on WP on the basis of one article. Britishfinance (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 11:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom; no evidence of notability --DannyS712 (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.