Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skating on ice with molasses
=[[Skating on ice with molasses]]=
:{{la|Skating on ice with molasses}} – (
:({{findsources|Skating on ice with molasses}})
This article gives a definition for a phrase which does not appear to be used at all by anyone - Google gives zero hits for it other than the article itself. Even if the phrase were in common use, it is doubtful whether it would be encyclopaedic enough to justify an article, but as is there is no reason for this article to exist. Thparkth (talk) 19:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, as per WP:MADEUP, no RS can be found. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Snow Delete. WP:MADEUP, WP:OR. — Rankiri (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete No sources, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:MADEUP. I originally PRODed it after being unable to find a single Google hit for it or anything similar. But the author contested it saying "Because it was not found in Google, it was added to Wikipedia for reference and updates" - clearly not understanding about sourcing. -- Boing! said Zebedee 21:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Snow delete per all above. Not much more can be said, I think... Peridon (talk) 21:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I agree about the WP:SNOW factor, but I listed it here because the WP:PROD was contested. Thparkth (talk) 01:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Snow delete per WP:NONSENSE (by the way, I don't think the creator understands what an analogy is). Erpert (let's talk about it) 05:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
:I'd have called it a metaphor... It is reasonably coherent, though. Peridon (talk) 20:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.