Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skipp A. H. Williamson

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Skipp A. H. Williamson}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Skipp_A._H._Williamson Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Skipp A. H. Williamson}})

:A better search is:({{Find sources AFD|Skipp Williamson}})

No real claim to fame here. Sources are either listings or casual mentions. Being a businesswoman isn't enough to pass the bar of WP:GNG. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep:This person was named 3rd most influential management consultant in Australia by the Australian Financial Review, the country's leading business news paper. She is one of the leading business people in the country and owns a global consulting firm. Compared to others on Wikipedia, she ought to measure up quite well. I would say.

:Against deletion. New but motivated (talk) 07:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep: Clearly notable: [https://theconstantinvestor.com/skipp-williamsons-consulting-career-started-free-flight/ a profile as "success story"], one of [https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/top-50-lgbti-executives-australia/#gs.ots0B62J top 50 LGBTI business executives in Australia], [https://www.consultancy.com.au/news/492/the-most-influential-consultants-in-australia-revealed The most influential consultants in Australia revealed] (one of 5), etc. Not just passing mentions. Possibly Fellowship of Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering is in itself a notability claim too. PamD 10:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
• Comment on article title: if kept, rename to Skipp Williamson as sources, even including formal ones like fellowship list, don't use her middle initials. Would have moved it myself except for ongoing AfD. PamD 10:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

::For info: on going to create the redirect from the natural title of Skipp Williamson I found there that an article at that title had been created in Dec 2015, speedied A7, moved to userspace as User:Donaldeval/Skipp Williamsonat user's request, deleted at user's request, user then blocked; page was re-created in March 2016 and March 2017 and deleted each time as "(G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Mamadoutadioukone) in violation of ban or block (TW))". I know nothing about that blocked user, and can't see whether this article is a re-creation of that ... but the "success story" ref is October 2017, so this is clearly NOT an exact copy, at least, of the deleted version. PamD 10:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

• I agree w the renaming suggestion.

New but motivated (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep: Clearly notable in Australian context. one of the bigger employers in the industry Rmarsden (talk) 10:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
• Weak keep I think there is just enough IRS to satisfy WP:NEXIST to get over the GNG line. Aoziwe (talk) 11:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

:: Could you fit in any more acronyms? ;) Rmarsden (talk) 11:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.