Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleazycheeks

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Basement Jaxx discography. MBisanz talk 03:02, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

=[[Sleazycheeks]]=

:{{la|Sleazycheeks}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sleazycheeks Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sleazycheeks}})

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

:Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [https://openlibrary.org/books/OL16773783M/The_Pitchfork_500], which lead me to [http://www.amazon.com/The-Pitchfork-500-Greatest-Present/dp/1416562028]. Other mentions: guardian.com[http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/aug/18/basement-jaxx-junto-album-stream], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/basement-jaxx-junto-20140826], the BBC [http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/28cbf94d-0700-4095-a188-37e373b069a7] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

:::I don't see that those reliable sources you've linked (Rolling Stone, BBC, The Guardian) mention "sleazycheeks" or "sleazy" anything.Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

:Redirect to Basement Jaxx discography. I'd also recommend bundling some of these nominations. Note that the notability of the band is not in question here just this specific release from the band. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

:::Do those sources mention sleazycheeks?Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep per sources provided above - Notability is there. –Davey2010Talk 12:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

:::Do those reliable sources (Rolling Stone, BBC, The Guardian) mention "sleazycheeks" or "sleazy" anything?Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

::::*Redirect per {{u|Anythingyouwant}} - My bad I or Lugnuts should've looked - Anyway the sources don't even mention "Sleazycheeks! - Well spotted Anythingyouwant{{p|grin}}. –Davey2010Talk 18:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

:Cheers --slakrtalk / 19:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.