Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartPPC EVO

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted. This was blatant advertising and the AfD had already run its course with no one other than the original author contesting it: a commercial ad serving software developed by Orbitscripts company. Created as a back-end system it provides ad management features that help to convert websites traffic into profit. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[SmartPPC EVO]]=

:{{la|SmartPPC EVO}} ([{{fullurl:SmartPPC EVO|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartPPC EVO}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Article has been tagged for some time as having both advertising and notability issues. These have not yet been addressed, and given that it's been nearly a month, deletion is likely in order. Tyrenon (talk) 06:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete -- a quick [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22SmartPPC+EVO%22&cf=all Google News archive search] turned up nothing reliable when searching on "SmartPPC EVO". Perhaps someone knows of another phrase to search on? (If notability is established, I'd be happy to change my recommendation). --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

What can be done to keep the article alive? Search for 'ad serving software' in Google, and you'll see it on the 1st page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dariakovalchuk (talk • contribs) 15:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.