Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smashball (Sport)

:{{la|Smashball (Sport)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Smashball (Sport)}})

This article doesn't make a claim to notability and actually asserts its insignificance. "Smashball is a little known sport" Ryan Vesey contribs 15:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom; gsearch indicates that it's of such local application that it's not notable in terms of significant coverage in independent sources. asnac (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete The sport is not covered by news sources at all. Together with Asnac's comments above about an unsuccessful attempt to find independent sources, I think we can safely smash this one out of the park. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 18:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete - Actually, the article does contain one reliable source in the form of a weekly community newspaper article outlining how a dad built a smashball court on a vacant lot and has been asked to tear it down for violating a variety of regulations including building things on somebody else's property. However, that alone is insufficient to demonstrate notability although it does put this article well above other WP:MADEUP articles in terms of sourcing. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. The sport does not seemm notable yet, and there is a lack of sources backing any notability (or lack thereof) that it has. Backtable _{Speak to me}^{concerning my deeds.} 02:45, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.