Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smita Agarwal

:{{la|Smita Agarwal}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Smita Agarwal}})

I can find no independent third-party sources to help establish the notability of this person. The article as it stands now does not, in my view, establish the notability with any of the references listed, and I find anthologies to not be an indication of notability. I also believe that nothing in the article construes importance or significance, but I did not feel comfortable placing an A7 tag on it, but rather wanted to get community consensus as to whether this person is notable enough for inclusion to Wikipedia.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 16:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. ukexpat (talk) 16:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 16:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

• delete per nom. --CarTick (talk) 04:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
• delete Seems like an autobio from a seemingly unknown person. Not enough references to keep the article going, and according to ArcAngel it doesn't seem like they're ever going to be. - Bkid ^{My talk}/_Contribs 07:17, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.