Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sobia Tahir

:{{la|Sobia Tahir}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sobia_Tahir Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sobia Tahir}})

Just collection of promotional stuff. No notability whatsoever. Fails WP:ACADEMICS and WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 12:01, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. Existing sources are primary. — TheMagnificentist 12:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
• Delete CV with no claim of notability. Agricola44 (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. Publishing stuff is not enough. It has to be noted. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC).
• Delete. Listing in a directory is not enough for WP:GNG and we also don't have evidence of passing any WP:PROF criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.