Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Wavelength (2nd nomination)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 09:16, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
=[[:Social Wavelength]]=
- {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Wavelength}}
:{{la|Social Wavelength}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Social Wavelength}})
This does not pass WP:NCORP. Dial911 (talk) 22:51, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Non notable PR agency. I nominated the article for afd1 , when it was closed as delete. This time we need to protect against re-creation DGG ( talk ) 23:47, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Insufficient media coverage - fails WP:GNG. I was going to suggest merging to J. Walter Thompson, with the single good source in the Social Wavelength article now, but there's no acquisitions section at JWT, and so it would be undue weight if added to the history section. If anyone ever does add JWT's acquisitions to a section, this could warrant at least a sentence, but otherwise, it's a delete. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 01:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.